Coca-Cola's AI-Generated Christmas Ad Sparks Debate Over Creativity and Innovation


Article by Ion Hatzithomas
Image source: Coca-Cola
As the festive season fast approaches, Coca-Cola finds itself at the center of a heated debate, thanks to its new AI-generated Christmas advertisements. The iconic beverage company, known for its heartwarming and nostalgic holiday ads, has embraced cutting-edge technology to produce a series of short AI-generated clips. However, the reaction has been far from celebratory, sparking both mockery and concern on social media.
The move by Coca-Cola follows a growing trend in the advertising industry to utilize AI in creating content. Developed in collaboration with three AI studios - Secret Level, Silverside AI, and Wild Card - these ads employed generative AI models Leonardo, Luma, Runway, and a late addition, Kling, to deliver the festive imagery. But instead of the anticipated cheer, the AI-generated ads drew criticism for their "creepy dystopian" aesthetics and flawed execution.
Coca-Cola's homage to its 1995 "Holidays Are Coming" campaign was meant to be a fusion of its cherished history with futuristic technology. The ad, depicted in a brief 15-second montage, showed cherry red trucks lighting up snowy roads, reminiscent of the original campaign. Yet, its execution left much to be desired. Observant viewers noted several glitches, such as non-spinning truck wheels and awkwardly large bystanders that defied natural proportions.
Critics argue that the ads highlight the inherent limitations of current AI video generation technology. While technically impressive, creating realistic human figures without distorting them remains a significant hurdle for AI, leading to the notorious 'uncanny valley' effect. In one particular ad featuring AI-generated humans, Coca-Cola opted for quick cuts and minimized screen time for virtual faces, perhaps in a bid to avoid unsettling viewers.
Image source: Coca-Cola
Online, reactions ranged from scathing to bewildered. Users on platforms like X and YouTube labeled the ad as "garbage," "ugly," and "lazy." Some lamented the encroachment of AI in commercial art, fearing it spells doom for creativity and artistic expression. Ironically, the very essence of "warmth" that Coca-Cola aimed to capture seems to have been lost, replaced instead by a generic and cold portrayal of the holiday spirit.
However, not all responses were negative. Proponents of AI argued that the technology presents an opportunity to blend creativity with efficiency. Pratik Thakar, Coca-Colas vice president and global head of generative AI, highlighted the advantages of AI, pointing out the cost-effectiveness and significant time savings in production. Thakar emphasized the ability to create a wider variety of content swiftly, aligning with the company's vision of leveraging technology to enhance its offerings.
Despite the backlash, Secret Level's Founder, Jason Zada, defended the creative process, underscoring the continued need for human input in generating effective AI content. He argued that there remains a human component crucial to imbibing the creation with emotional depth - a fact perhaps overlooked by critics quick to denounce the ads.
The controversy surrounding Coca-Cola's AI-generated commercial serves as a reflection of the broader societal conversation about the role of AI in creativity, art, and industry. It raises essential questions about the future of advertisement, the preservation of artistic integrity, and the potential replacement of human labor.
Image source: Coca-Cola
As AI continues to evolve, companies like Coca-Cola will need to navigate the fine line between innovation and authenticity, ensuring their digital forays resonate with audiences who yearn for the genuine emotional connection that has long been the hallmark of memorable holiday campaigns.
Watch The New Coca-Cola AI Ad on YouTube
What do you think about the ad? Share your comments with us.
But using AI? With the revenue they have? Lmao.
They could pay any good animator in this community around 1000$ and they would do much more better