3D Models
3D Print Models
3D Scans
Animation & MoCap
Textures
Materials
Skin Textures
2D Game Assets
Sound Effects
Brushes & Tools
Reference Photos
Stock Images
HDR Images
3ds Max
Maya
Blender
Unreal Engine
Unity
ZBrush
Cinema 4D
LightWave
Marmoset
SketchUp
FBX
DAE
DXF
GLBWhich Genesis Version Is Best?
0Article by RenderHub
The center of gravity is still Genesis 8, taking 59% (786 votes), followed by Genesis 9 at 23% (299). 14% (185) said they don't use Daz Studio, while Genesis 3 captured 2% (30), Genesis 2 had 1% (14), and the original Genesis had 1% (12).
| Poll Results: | |
| Genesis | 1% |
| Genesis 2 | 1% |
| Genesis 3 | 2% |
| Genesis 8 | 59% |
| Genesis 9 | 23% |
| I don't use Daz Studio | 14% |
| 1326 people responded to this poll. | |
What the numbers really say
If you exclude the 14% who don't use Daz Studio, Genesis 8 accounts for about 69% of active DS users in this sample, with Genesis 9 at around 26%. That's nearly a 3:1 ratio among current users. Genesis 3 and earlier generations now make up a very slim long tail (about 5% combined among DS users), suggesting most work today is concentrated in the last two generations.
Render By lux0
Why Genesis 8 still dominates
- Content Gravity: For years, the marketplace built a vast ecosystem around Genesis 8 and 8.1 characters, hair, clothing, morph packs, poses, and niche tools. That library represents sunk cost for artists and creators and functions like a powerful network effect: the more content there is, the more people stay, and the more creators keep producing for it.
- Proven Pipelines: Tutorials, plugins, converters, and export pipelines to Blender, Unreal, and other tools have been refined for Genesis 8 over time. Users with production-tested workflows are reluctant to retool midstream.
- Compatibility and Performance: Genesis 8 content generally just works with widely used shaders and render setups, and many artists have established look-dev recipes built on Iray Uber and 8/8.1 skins. For some users, Genesis 8 also feels lighter and more predictable across older GPUs and VRAM budgets.
- Conversion Safety Net: Even if you're eyeing Genesis 9, the abundance of reliable converters and fit-control tools for Genesis 8 makes it a safe base. Artists can bridge forward or backward as needed.
What Genesis 9's 23% share indicates
- Some Traction: Roughly one in four DS users in the poll prefer Genesis 9. Although slow, there is some adoption.
- Friction Remains: While the G9 catalog continues to grow, it has yet to match the breadth of G8. Conversions have improved, but artists with large G8 libraries don't feel urgency to switch when they can already produce at a high level.
Advice for artists choosing a path
- New to Daz Studio: Start with Genesis 9 for future-proofing, but keep Genesis 8 installed. Learn both; it maximizes content options and compatibility.
- Existing Genesis 8 Libraries: There's no rush to switch wholesale. Adopt Genesis 9 selectively for projects that benefit from its rigging and shaders, and use converters or legacy UV solutions when needed.
- Animation-Heavy Pipelines: Test both with your motion library and export path. Some animation sets and retargeting rigs remain stronger on Genesis 8; others see cleaner deformations on Genesis 9.
Forecast
Expect a long overlap. Genesis 8's content mountain ensures it remains dominant in the near term. Genesis 9's share should grow as catalog depth matures, and as more users adopt the unified base. If history is a guide, the inflection point tends to arrive when artists can reproduce their go-to looks and workflows on the new generation without sacrificing speed or variety.
Bottom line
A mature, content-rich platform (Genesis 8) is holding the majority while the new platform (Genesis 9) struggles to gain meaningful ground. For most artists, which genesis version they prefer is clear.
