Free 3D
3D Print Models
3D Scans
Animation & MoCap
Textures
Materials
Skin Reference
2D Game Assets
Sound Effects
Brushes & Tools
Reference Photos
Stock Images
HDR Images
3ds Max
Maya
Blender
Unreal Engine
Unity
ZBrush
Cinema 4D
LightWave
Marmoset
SketchUp
FBX
DAE
DXF
GLBCGI gets tagged as AI - Is your work effected? (CLOSED)
256Thread Activity
bonjSat, Mar 14
JackolanternSat, Mar 14
bonjSat, Mar 14
bonjSat, Mar 14
JackolanternFri, Mar 13
DoroThee237Fri, Mar 13
I put a few of my renders to the test and was disappointed. I know there not ai and in a way it's a messed up compliment but this is not good for artist that do not entertain ai in their workflow.
My customers want original and real products. Some support me because I am not using ai. Now I have to make video's and document my work just to prove it's real. More work and hard drive space needed.
This is not a post about the cons or pro's of ai. Just to highlight that everything is now considered ai unless proven otherwise.
A bunch of examples bellow. Test your work and share the results if you want.
My customers want original and real products. Some support me because I am not using ai. Now I have to make video's and document my work just to prove it's real. More work and hard drive space needed.
This is not a post about the cons or pro's of ai. Just to highlight that everything is now considered ai unless proven otherwise.
A bunch of examples bellow. Test your work and share the results if you want.
! REPORT
Out of 10 images tested 3 were tagged ai .
They forget a lesser used term nowadays "cgi".
Shame that the industry we feed doesn't support us a little more. Ai is bad news for artist.
They forget a lesser used term nowadays "cgi".
Shame that the industry we feed doesn't support us a little more. Ai is bad news for artist.
REPLY
! REPORT
dirtrider00
Karma: 25,911
Tue, Mar 10Sounds like the app needs more train....ain...ain....ain....aing...... 
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Tue, Mar 10Yeah it's still a bit rubbish . Only analyses against a possible real photo or traditional art. Has no clue about renders.
Can't compu
compu
comptre,
ERROR1,
ERROR1 ,
BLANK SCREEN. . .
Can't compu
compu
comptre,
ERROR1,
ERROR1 ,
BLANK SCREEN. . .
dirtrider00
Karma: 25,911
Tue, Mar 10Outside of some AI music videos I've watched over on youtube I really haven't kept up with the whole AI thing. You'd think whoever designed the app would have been smart enough to run some CGI images through it from sights like here to help train it alittle better to spot the differences if training is actually the right word.
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Tue, Mar 10Same here, I haven't kept up with it much. Even having a teenager in the house but he is studying film theory and hates ai also.
His friend gives me the low down every so often.
His friend gives me the low down every so often.
Not on this site, but I've had a few flagged as AI that I know weren't AI. It was interesting to say the least.
REPLY
! REPORT
I tested it with one of my product promotion images, and the analysis result is correct.
the link : https://decopy.ai/ai-image-detector/
the link : https://decopy.ai/ai-image-detector/
REPLY
! REPORT
Damn, I'm good!
Ran alot of my recent portraits I've uploaded to the gallery along with quite a few I didn't upload.
100% AI on all of the images I ran through it. Guess I need to tone down some of my render settings or something to leave a few firefly/artefacts in my renders.
Ran alot of my recent portraits I've uploaded to the gallery along with quite a few I didn't upload.
100% AI on all of the images I ran through it. Guess I need to tone down some of my render settings or something to leave a few firefly/artefacts in my renders.
REPLY
! REPORT
dirtrider00
Karma: 25,911
Wed, Mar 11Uhg...I was being sarcastic about being good. Mainly just suprised everything I ran through it was rated 100% AI and I don't even do post work.
Wonder if not doing postwork has something to do with it?
Wonder if not doing postwork has something to do with it?
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Thu, Mar 12Hahahaha It doesn't make a lot of sense does it . At least it can be a kind f benchmark for your work. If it thinks it's ai then it must be looking good 
All my new images posted to Pinterest are tagged as AI modified. I got sick of it and deleted them all. I'm not going to file a complaint for every single image I post.
REPLY
! REPORT
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Thu, Mar 12As funny as it can be there's a real danger for genuine artist that people will think the work is ai. Once we loose faith from our clients we are done and ai wins.
What a sad state for art. Art that has over 10 thousand years of history.
What a sad state for art. Art that has over 10 thousand years of history.
Out of curiousity, I ran about a dozen of my images through that. Every one of them came back 100% human origin. Make me wonder why Pinterest's bot is so bad.
REPLY
! REPORT
guy91600
Karma: 21,408
Wed, Mar 11The quote, "Make me wonder why Pinterest's bot is so bad."
The problem isn't the bot, but the human who programmed it!
The problem isn't the bot, but the human who programmed it!
This has probably got to be my best result.
It looks like the detector thought this was a real photo!
REPLY
! REPORT
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Thu, Mar 12Yes it thinks that's a photo.. Great work , you now your doing good if ai is fooled.
I ran a few of my images through this detector and got this for one of them, which was nice:
But, its worth taking into account that most of these detectors are created using AI, often by people who wouldn't know an AI image if it crawled up their arse and died.
Every time a person uploads an image to check, that image is being added to its data set to check other images against.
Also, its an online app which means its hackable.
People will generally pick one detector and use that all the time rather than running the same image through a number of different ones and comparing the results. People often run with the first answer they get.
Thats the problem with apps like Grok, ChatGPT, etc. People take the first answer and accept it as truth. However if you take that first answer and question it a number of times you find out that the majority of times its original answer was either wrong or full of inaccuracies.
But, its worth taking into account that most of these detectors are created using AI, often by people who wouldn't know an AI image if it crawled up their arse and died.
Every time a person uploads an image to check, that image is being added to its data set to check other images against.
Also, its an online app which means its hackable.
People will generally pick one detector and use that all the time rather than running the same image through a number of different ones and comparing the results. People often run with the first answer they get.
Thats the problem with apps like Grok, ChatGPT, etc. People take the first answer and accept it as truth. However if you take that first answer and question it a number of times you find out that the majority of times its original answer was either wrong or full of inaccuracies.
REPLY
! REPORT
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Fri, Mar 13"Every time a person uploads an image to check, that image is being added to its data set to check other images against. "
Yes and there's no easy way to correct it's mistakes, making the situation even worst.
Yes and there's no easy way to correct it's mistakes, making the situation even worst.
It won't be long until the companies that make AI image generation sites will add a bit of noise to sneak through the AI detectors. The characters will still have 3 (or 7) fingers, weird teeth and screwy eyeballs, but they'll pass.
REPLY
! REPORT
DoroThee237
Karma: 19,699
Fri, Mar 13Perhaps the images will always have 3 or 7 fingers, but in that case, I hope there will be an update to count the number of fingers and consider them AI if the number is greater than 5 with an overall human shape
It's tricky.. remember the average person has less than two legs.
REPLY
! REPORT
Jackolantern
Karma: 494
Sat, Mar 14Some people have one leg, some have no legs, most have two legs. If you divide the number of legs by the number of people then you'll get an answer that the average is very slightly less than two.
bonj
Karma: 15,160
Sat, Mar 14Exactly, and statistically there must be a headless person somewhere. I'm just being silly but mathematically in theory. They may not live very long but they exist even if briefly.