×
Zoom
 
close x
Horrific Render Contest 5 – $3,800 In Prizes – Ends October 31st»  click for contest rules and prizes  «
HOME/FORUMS/GENERAL DISCUSSION

Uber or PBRSkin

eye611
Thread Activity
Luxe MuseSun, Feb 08
Forgot to mention, this is 8.1, not nine
Luxe MuseSun, Feb 08
I also reduce the light intensity compared to my usual very bright lighting setup. I set crushed blacks and burned highlights to 0.3 each, and I apply
Luxe MuseSun, Feb 08
I played around with her Uber Map a little more. For the glossy weight and roughness, I use the specular map and the specular roughness map. She has
PastilSun, Feb 08
Dual Lobe SpecularWeight : 1Reflectivity :1Roughness Mult : 0.5Ratio : 0.5Try this one... I don't know what kind of moisture you want.
Luxe MuseSun, Feb 08
I'm sorry to hear you're ill, Pushe-Ri. I hope you get better soon!!I'm playing around with Amelia's Uber Map where I duplicated her specular and spec
Pushee-RiSun, Feb 08
I'm still quite ill (hence my long absence... and probably also some feverish ideas): This could work with a special map for Topcoat. For example, use
Luxe MuseWed, Feb 04
Karma: 9,329
I'm very curious about what most people prefer now. Personally, I think both are good, but I'm more accustomed to the PBRSkin shader. How about you? And more importantly, why?
PastilThu, Feb 05
Karma: 763
I prefer PBRSkin giving good results, little bit slow but can optimize, even works well with the animations. I created my custom Genesis 8 figure also using Forum ImagePBR details for eyes and skin microdetails perfect.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
That's a good point. I personally keep all the micro-details in the bump and normal layers, rather than in the detail layers. It might be a little slower during pre-blending, but it shouldn't affect render pass performance.

I think the performance hit comes from the shader's own internal math and operations. Perhaps the detail layers trigger some very expensive calculations in the underlying native surface shader, whereas the uber shader might offload some of those to the vertex stage. (I might be mixing this up with old DirectX shader bottlenecks from my early days, but I believe the principles still apply.)

MasterstrokeThu, Feb 05
Karma: 6,138
I prefer Uber skin material.
While PBR skin looks amazing on dark skin types, bright skin always looks flat and dry like unglazed ceramics.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Thank you, Masterstroke. I am currently working on Amelia's Uber material, but I remember when I worked on Hanna's, things just looked naturally oily, and I thought, what is this sorcery?

I have noticed that most skins tend to look more alabaster in Uber than in PBRSkin. I love alabaster skin, and for me, when I use PBR, I put more effort into tweaking translucency for that reason otherwise it simply doesn't come out the way I want it. Whereas for tanned or chocolate skin, I really do not need to do as much.

Regarding the flatness, I am with you on that. I struggle with it. However, to me, the results improve a lot when I adjust Specular and Roughness.
Luxe MuseThu, Feb 05
Karma: 9,329
Here are my works with Amelia's skin for, first, PBRSkin, and then Uber at the bottom.

Forum Image

Uber (WIP)

Forum Image

Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
This is a G8 Base. The only difference in her Uber Skin (values) is that I've added 0.10 weight to Gloss, turned shared inputs on, and used the same specular and roughness maps for both the reflectivity and roughness channels, while keeping the same dual lobe specular setup from PBRSkin.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
I like her Uber more, though it is not complete yet. It already looks a little better, in my opinion.

As for performance, a quick test shows that both are performing the same: 2% at 19 seconds with identical environment and render settings. I'm not claiming this is a real test, hi, hi, hi.

ArtbyMel
Karma: 20,572
Thu, Feb 05
I think the PBR looks much better.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Thank you ArtbyMel emote I do like it too.
PastilThu, Feb 05
Karma: 763
Are you considering a Genesis 8.1 version of Amelia? I think it would be great. I'm having issues with texture blending and correction morphs in Genesis 9. 
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Oh yes, I am very close to finishing her G8-8.1 version. emote

I actually made a few more corrective morphs for her 8 than I did for 9. But I plan to continue adding corrective morphs for all versions, especially for ballet poses, which tend to stretch the limits. And who doesn't love ballet? Please don't answer that last one. I'd rather live in my fantasy world. emote
tedberlinThu, Feb 05
Karma: 1,352
I too prefer Uber on fair lighter skins but on some darker tanned skins PBR actually looks better. I use G9 but I still prefer G8.1 on females. At this point in my Daz journey if I don't like the way a skin looks I go into surfaces and the default templates and make adjustments there...if still no good I switch to another skin and another till I'm satisfied. From what I have discovered if you get the right skin and lighting just right renders look best. ..just my 2 cents

Luxe skins uber or pbr are excellent!
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Thank you so much, Ted. You are always very kind to me. I think it makes sense, and you all have corroborated what I suspected.

Another thought I was having is that perhaps, when there is more than one figure in the scene, Uber does speed up the render. I do want to run some tests on this, probably this month.

Perhaps I should make an Uber option for all my G9 models as well.
PastilThu, Feb 05
Karma: 763
Basic genesis 8.1 with PBR Skin. Forum Image
tedberlin
Karma: 1,352
Thu, Feb 05
That looks really good!
tedberlin
Karma: 1,352
Thu, Feb 05
That looks super realistic to me!
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Very well done, the pores really pop up, love it.
PastilThu, Feb 05
Karma: 763
All about lighting and of course your render engine, skin color does not matter.
bonjThu, Feb 05
Karma: 15,160
PBR works better in unreal.  Something to keep in mind. 
Masterstroke
Karma: 6,138
Thu, Feb 05
As far as I understand IRAy Uber is already "PBR" material.
The PBR material we are talking about here, is a physical based material, that supposed to work better across plattform.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
Good point from you both.

Perhaps the various settings and options in PBRSkin, compared to Uber, and the way both are generally set up or used for skins, are better reproducible in Unreal. Could that be the reason?
PastilThu, Feb 05
Karma: 763
Basic genesis 8.1 with Uber. need to edit every single line of material_libraryForum Image
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
If the settings are the same, this clearly shows how Uber softens the tone by favoring lighter colors.
supremoomegaThu, Feb 05
Karma: 4,904
I'd like a PBR shader, with some Uber parameters.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Feb 05
That is very, very fair, @SupreMoomega! Just a little lemon juice, a mint leaf, and rum, you have a tasty Daiquiri.

PastilSun, Feb 08
Karma: 763
Say hi to Amelia 8.1, really great. Thanks!Forum Image
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Sun, Feb 08
Hi Meli: Thank you so much, Pastil,
MasterstrokeSun, Feb 08
Karma: 6,138
So, again. Please help me out here.
What would you do, to get moisture on the PBR skin?
On those hyper real renders done with Blender and now even CC5, you can see that moisture in the pores of the skin.
How can you achive that with DAZ PBR shaders, especially on lighter skin?
Pushee-Ri
Karma: 52,873
Sun, Feb 08
I'm still quite ill (hence my long absence... and probably also some feverish ideas): This could work with a special map for Topcoat. For example, use a bump map with increased contrast and reduced bright areas as a basis. Then work a little with the Topcoat parameters and, if necessary, even use an additional Topcoat bump map.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Sun, Feb 08
I'm sorry to hear you're ill, Pushe-Ri. I hope you get better soon!!

I'm playing around with Amelia's Uber Map where I duplicated her specular and specular roughness maps on to the glossy layer. And also with lighting and tone mapping. Will share here once it finishes rendering.
Pastil
Karma: 763
Sun, Feb 08
Dual Lobe Specular
Weight : 1
Reflectivity :1
Roughness Mult : 0.5
Ratio : 0.5
Try this one... I don't know what kind of moisture you want.
Luxe MuseSun, Feb 08
Karma: 9,329
I played around with her Uber Map a little more. 

Forum Image

For the glossy weight and roughness, I use the specular map and the specular roughness map. She has a top coat weight map too, but I also use her specular roughness map for the top coat roughness. I changed the layering mode to Fresnel. Her bump maps are very soft; the pores are very light and small. Perhaps a stronger bump would help with the pores under the glossy layer effect.


Forum Image

Forum Image

Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Sun, Feb 08
I also reduce the light intensity compared to my usual very bright lighting setup. I set crushed blacks and burned highlights to 0.3 each, and I apply a 2.4 gamma correction, which is the default in my Luxe's render environment settings.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Sun, Feb 08
Forgot to mention, this is 8.1, not nine
Close WindowRenderHub Login

Show Password

Reset password
Create Account