End of "strictly for adults" products.
545Thread Activity
AvessoMon, Sep 21
AnasSecretSat, Sep 19
Luxe MuseFri, Sep 18
AnasSecretFri, Sep 18
Luxe MuseThu, Sep 17
AnasSecretThu, Sep 17
Gostaria de entender os critérios do site para sinalizar produtos como impróprios para venda, visto que o meu produto — uma simples máscara de látex — foi removido, enquanto outros itens — como um saco colocado na cabeça e preso com fita adesiva — permanecem disponíveis. Menciono isso porque o outro produto claramente sugere sufocamento, enquanto o meu era meramente um acessório para ser usado. Sinceramente, gostaria de um esclarecimento sobre isso, pois o raciocínio não me parece claro — sou o único que não entende? Quero deixar registrado meu descontentamento aqui: se um produto é permitido, por que outros não são?
! REPORT
Provided that I understand you correctly (a translation aid was needed
):
I suspect, the problem is the *latex* in the mask. That's considered as fetish, i.e. sex-reletaed. And I also suspect that this platform behaves like others from a similar culture: Blood is okay, weapons are fine, killing people is acceptable. Sex isn't.
Please notice this big smile in my face while I write this. I really enjoy such anecdotes that show the narrow limits of cultural tolerance as soon as it hits one's own culture (it's the same with mine, of course!) - even if I feel sorry for the vendors.
):I suspect, the problem is the *latex* in the mask. That's considered as fetish, i.e. sex-reletaed. And I also suspect that this platform behaves like others from a similar culture: Blood is okay, weapons are fine, killing people is acceptable. Sex isn't.
Please notice this big smile in my face while I write this. I really enjoy such anecdotes that show the narrow limits of cultural tolerance as soon as it hits one's own culture (it's the same with mine, of course!) - even if I feel sorry for the vendors.
REPLY
! REPORT
Avesso
Karma: 550
Wed, Sep 16Yeah, it’s impressive—they allow all sorts of things, even torture, but when it comes to sex, things get ugly; they’re a bunch of hypocrites, or probably asexual beings. However, I have other products containing latex that are still active—maybe because the latex is just a secondary material... That gave me an idea: I’ll sell the mask as a Halloween item with fabric as the main material, and list the latex as a secondary option. Let’s see if that works...
There's other sites that will happily sell your item. They're in Europe of course.
REPLY
! REPORT
AnasSecret
Karma: 1,044
Thu, Sep 17Europe, where you should avoid realistic weapons. And current Russian military technology in current material options, of course 

Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Thu, Sep 17Censorship in all regards is very wrong. I myself have always been critical of Korea and their blurred knife thing, as if that would drive people to do bad stuff.
AnasSecret
Karma: 1,044
Thu, Sep 17It would be an impressive, challenging competition to render worldwide censorship topics. Whoever hits most topics what are censored somewhere wins
And transparency woul be easy: simply count.
And transparency woul be easy: simply count.AnasSecret
Karma: 1,044
Fri, Sep 18Misunderstanding. I meant: The rendering with the most censorship topics used wins 
I can say little about Cuba or Nicaragua, but I can say a lot about mote and beams in the eyes. And the millennia-old complaint about which one is easiest to overlook. Foreign cultures are foreign by definition. I think everything stands out if you don't see it every day.

I can say little about Cuba or Nicaragua, but I can say a lot about mote and beams in the eyes. And the millennia-old complaint about which one is easiest to overlook. Foreign cultures are foreign by definition. I think everything stands out if you don't see it every day.
Luxe Muse
Karma: 9,329
Fri, Sep 18I was joking, Anas, about world censorship. But like I originally said, it is always bad. Even if it is a cultural thing, that doesn’t excuse the fact that it is. Some people confuse censorship with a complete lack of morals for all, or something. That is not what I mean. Mostly I’m referring to censorship in art (i.e. Korean knives in soap operas).
AnasSecret
Karma: 1,044
Sat, Sep 19*relieved sighing* At first I really thought I was so massively misleding 
I'm very generous with the conected terms (censorship, art, journalism & Co.). At least at the first steps. But I'm also willing to defend censorship measures. It's still censorship and should be called that.
(I come from a country where you can go to prison for three years if you draw horses copulating on your school desk),

I'm very generous with the conected terms (censorship, art, journalism & Co.). At least at the first steps. But I'm also willing to defend censorship measures. It's still censorship and should be called that.
(I come from a country where you can go to prison for three years if you draw horses copulating on your school desk),
Avesso
Karma: 550
Mon, Sep 21And what I meant was that there shouldn't be censorship in art based on subliminal reasons.





