General clarification about my latest work.
482Thread Activity
TZO3k1Tue, Jun 03
AnabranTue, Jun 03
TenserknotTue, Jun 03
the joker of spadesTue, Jun 03
AnabranTue, Jun 03
bu_esTue, Jun 03
General clarification about my latest work. My work is based on 80% Daz3d, my characters, and my renders. 10% IC Lightv2, which is in Hugginsface spaces. And 10% PhotoshopCS6 with the final touch-up. I already explained this to Renderhub in the DM they sent me tonight. I never hid anything. You could say they are hybrid works. That being the case, I don't do it locally in my AI program, precisely to respect the rules and make my characters as they are. That light changes the skin... well, we all know that depending on how the lights are placed, etc., the skin looks one way or another. In fact, I always post the original so you can see that it's the same render.
! REPORT
Hey, I don't know why you need to write the clarification - it would never have occurred to me to pin something with AI on you - but thanks for all the info 
I have admired and envied your last pictures. And since you show a) the programs used and b) the original render, there should be clarity for everyone ... even if a photo background is used. I would have to fiddle with the DAZ sliders for all eternity to achieve such lighting quality ... and wouldn't even come close to your quality
And nobody here should really have anything against post proc - after all, this (like everything else within DAZ) is manual work and not done automatically by some machines.
Have a nice weekend

I have admired and envied your last pictures. And since you show a) the programs used and b) the original render, there should be clarity for everyone ... even if a photo background is used. I would have to fiddle with the DAZ sliders for all eternity to achieve such lighting quality ... and wouldn't even come close to your quality

And nobody here should really have anything against post proc - after all, this (like everything else within DAZ) is manual work and not done automatically by some machines.
Have a nice weekend

REPLY
! REPORT
bu_es
Karma: 10,703
Sat, May 31Thanks, but it seems that there are people who are bothered by my way of working and have reported an AI violation.
VPNito
Karma: 2,033
Tue, Jun 03That's because it is an AI violation, per the posted AI Policy.
"AI-generated images are not allowed in any of the gallery or wallpaper sections"
https://www.renderhub.com/info/ai-content-policy
Sorry, but IC Light is generative AI dude.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
"AI-generated images are not allowed in any of the gallery or wallpaper sections"
https://www.renderhub.com/info/ai-content-policy
Sorry, but IC Light is generative AI dude.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
Quote:Thanks, but it seems that there are people who are bothered by my way of working and have reported an AI violation.
The confusion is understandable.
Renderhub initially responded to the advent of AI by presenting itself as community where no AI is allowed which gave the impression to some that Renderhub had an absolutist position prohibiting even posting links to AI generated content for discussion
and anyone expressing pro AI views
could be personally insulted and attacked with the tacit approval of the site owners and would even be banned.
There was a pro AI thread of mine where I was attacked and
defended my position with such alacrity and vigor
that it resulted in at least one assailant being
apparently removed from this forum for disrupting
many other thread trying to discredit me as I had blocked them from responding to my threads and another person
having an apparent mental health crisis over the matter.
The Admins Posted a new clarification on the AI policy
define the limits of what is allowed such as Posting
links to AI content for the purpose of discussion.
https://www.renderhub.com/forum/9928/ai-content-policy-and-guidelines-feedback-requested
what I found unclear and vague in the new clarification
is the statement "substantially created with AI" is prohibited.
I don't think you work fits this definition but again I am pro AI as tool just as I a pro mocap for character animation.
"substantially created with AI"
is still vague and left up the interpretation of the each individual and could mean different things depending on if the person was sincerely concerned about a possible violation or on an anti AI witch hunt.
And the recent debacle, with the Grafitti
contest, only further laid bare the utter folly of trying to hold true to an absolutist anti AI position in a world where
it is becoming as ubiquitous as oxygen itself.
The confusion is understandable.
Renderhub initially responded to the advent of AI by presenting itself as community where no AI is allowed which gave the impression to some that Renderhub had an absolutist position prohibiting even posting links to AI generated content for discussion
and anyone expressing pro AI views
could be personally insulted and attacked with the tacit approval of the site owners and would even be banned.
There was a pro AI thread of mine where I was attacked and
defended my position with such alacrity and vigor
that it resulted in at least one assailant being
apparently removed from this forum for disrupting
many other thread trying to discredit me as I had blocked them from responding to my threads and another person
having an apparent mental health crisis over the matter.
The Admins Posted a new clarification on the AI policy
define the limits of what is allowed such as Posting
links to AI content for the purpose of discussion.
https://www.renderhub.com/forum/9928/ai-content-policy-and-guidelines-feedback-requested
what I found unclear and vague in the new clarification
is the statement "substantially created with AI" is prohibited.
I don't think you work fits this definition but again I am pro AI as tool just as I a pro mocap for character animation.
"substantially created with AI"
is still vague and left up the interpretation of the each individual and could mean different things depending on if the person was sincerely concerned about a possible violation or on an anti AI witch hunt.
And the recent debacle, with the Grafitti
contest, only further laid bare the utter folly of trying to hold true to an absolutist anti AI position in a world where
it is becoming as ubiquitous as oxygen itself.
REPLY
! REPORT
In the grand scheme of things I don't care what you do, but if you take an averge 3D render and run it through an AI tool, then the final output is an enhanced AI image.
And the idea that you only give it 10% influence when obviously the AI software changed and enhanced the lighting on the entire input of the character figure, so almost every pixel was altered in some way, and then add an AI generated background, since some your input art was against a solid color or minimalist backdrop,
well that substantially generated by AI threshold is getting ever closer.
As I said, I dont care, but if someone reported it, there is enough here to be justified in being bother by it.
As Anabran said, AI is here to stay, but if there are rules difficult to be enforced, they should still be upheld as guidelines atleast.
And the idea that you only give it 10% influence when obviously the AI software changed and enhanced the lighting on the entire input of the character figure, so almost every pixel was altered in some way, and then add an AI generated background, since some your input art was against a solid color or minimalist backdrop,
well that substantially generated by AI threshold is getting ever closer.
As I said, I dont care, but if someone reported it, there is enough here to be justified in being bother by it.
As Anabran said, AI is here to stay, but if there are rules difficult to be enforced, they should still be upheld as guidelines atleast.
REPLY
! REPORT
What???
bu_es - You seem like a nice person, so please don't think I'm bashing you. But I think you're wildly off-base here.
"80% Daz3d" and "10% IC Lightv2"
Really? You have entirely new backgrounds created by AI, and the appearance of your characters has been altered.
"I don't do it locally in my AI program"
I'm not sure why online or local Generative AI matters.
"That light changes the skin"
Let's be real here. IC-Light V2 is not just a "light".
"depending on how the lights are placed"
You aren't "placing any lights" in these images. AI is doing that.
And I'm sorry, but your title for this thread: "General clarification about my latest work"
Your work? I think it would be more accurate to say "General clarification about what Generative AI did"
bu_es - You seem like a nice person, so please don't think I'm bashing you. But I think you're wildly off-base here.
"80% Daz3d" and "10% IC Lightv2"
Really? You have entirely new backgrounds created by AI, and the appearance of your characters has been altered.
"I don't do it locally in my AI program"
I'm not sure why online or local Generative AI matters.
"That light changes the skin"
Let's be real here. IC-Light V2 is not just a "light".
"depending on how the lights are placed"
You aren't "placing any lights" in these images. AI is doing that.
And I'm sorry, but your title for this thread: "General clarification about my latest work"
Your work? I think it would be more accurate to say "General clarification about what Generative AI did"
REPLY
! REPORT
Can you really, honestly, say that this is an 80% Daz / 10% AI "relit" image?
AI had only 10% to do with this? You think this is just "different lighting"?
https://www.renderhub.com/gallery/68155/luis-g9-studio-2025-relit

AI had only 10% to do with this? You think this is just "different lighting"?
https://www.renderhub.com/gallery/68155/luis-g9-studio-2025-relit

REPLY
! REPORT
bu_es
Karma: 10,703
Sat, May 31I can show you other things that are not as much as what I say... and would you really say that is not Daz... the same thing that some people from IA tell me that what I do is too daz3d... what are we left with? I am not in any place... are they bad for both of us?
JohnnyLuck777
Karma: 4,357
Sat, May 31"would you really say that is not Daz"
My answer to your question would be: The original render - yes. The AI-generated output - absolutely not.
My answer to your question would be: The original render - yes. The AI-generated output - absolutely not.
JohnnyLuck777
Karma: 4,357
Sat, May 31I answered your question, so I would appreciate if you would answer mine:
Do you think AI had only 10% to do with this?
Do you think this is just "different lighting"?
Do you think AI had only 10% to do with this?
Do you think this is just "different lighting"?
TZO3k1
Karma: 892
Sun, Jun 01This is definitely rendered in AI, note the smooth eyebrow muscles between the two, not to mention the smoother, unpronounced knuckles, thinner/straight, lips, and deeper set eyes on the original, no, this was rendered using AI, one cannot expect to fool literal visual artists with AI…
Hell, even the original did not have a cleft chin…
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with folks that render their original models using AI, just don't claim otherwise…
Hell, even the original did not have a cleft chin…
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with folks that render their original models using AI, just don't claim otherwise…
I'm so sorry you got reported.
Your work is very good, and you've been completely honest in showing both pieces.
So I don't see the reason for such a thing.
Your work is very good, and you've been completely honest in showing both pieces.
So I don't see the reason for such a thing.
REPLY
! REPORT
VPNito
Karma: 2,033
Tue, Jun 03Maybe you don't realize this is not "his work". It is generative AI.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
@anabran
"There was a pro AI thread of mine where I was attacked and
defended my position with such alacrity and vigor"
pmsl Is that what you call it....
Truth is you are incapable of having a genuine and reasonable conversation about AI and you focus on your pro AI stance without any consideration for it's real world effects of destroying multiple industries causing poverty and disruption globally. I would discus it in depth with you but you don't want to listen to opinions , only give them.
I responded to your pro AI thread only to be attacked and insulted by yourself. I was expecting an adult conversation , not a duck shoot. You then blocked me so we can never have a genuine discussion, your hiding from anyone with a different opinion while you repeatedly post pro AI at every opportunity.
My 30 years experience including being a producer / director working on average 14 productions a year would be worth something but No. Just put your fingers in your ears and sing LA LA LA. Your not interested unless it promotes your little video ditties..
There are a handful of companies that will dominate and make a huge profit while all industries lay off staff globally. All so a few can get very very rich.
Let me just point out that in the UK we are heading for a drought. Because AI is now considered nationally important will it be prioritized to use the drinking water over hosepipes, showers, drinking water for both human and livestock? Where does it end? Power cuts are coming so we can feed the AI with the electricity that used to power our PC's . Where will Ai art be then?
Lets drain all the reservoirs so we can generate crappy AI images.
@ bu_es IC Lightv2 is AI
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
"There was a pro AI thread of mine where I was attacked and
defended my position with such alacrity and vigor"
pmsl Is that what you call it....
Truth is you are incapable of having a genuine and reasonable conversation about AI and you focus on your pro AI stance without any consideration for it's real world effects of destroying multiple industries causing poverty and disruption globally. I would discus it in depth with you but you don't want to listen to opinions , only give them.
I responded to your pro AI thread only to be attacked and insulted by yourself. I was expecting an adult conversation , not a duck shoot. You then blocked me so we can never have a genuine discussion, your hiding from anyone with a different opinion while you repeatedly post pro AI at every opportunity.
My 30 years experience including being a producer / director working on average 14 productions a year would be worth something but No. Just put your fingers in your ears and sing LA LA LA. Your not interested unless it promotes your little video ditties..
There are a handful of companies that will dominate and make a huge profit while all industries lay off staff globally. All so a few can get very very rich.
Let me just point out that in the UK we are heading for a drought. Because AI is now considered nationally important will it be prioritized to use the drinking water over hosepipes, showers, drinking water for both human and livestock? Where does it end? Power cuts are coming so we can feed the AI with the electricity that used to power our PC's . Where will Ai art be then?
Lets drain all the reservoirs so we can generate crappy AI images.
@ bu_es IC Lightv2 is AI
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
REPLY
! REPORT
Quote:I responded to your pro AI thread only to be attacked and insulted by yourself. I was expecting an adult conversation
You rushed into my thread with name calling and accusations about my old client work being "game mods"
instead of poser animations rendered in Maxon C4D ( about which you clearly know nothing )
you were defending an obsessed person who later turned his attacks on you.
I cooked you both with deadly precision and some entertaining
animations, based on your own posts, with Reallusion Cartoon Animator (Not AI)
you fled the thread claiming it was an "ambush" with the promise of: " Never interacting with me again "
yet here you are hijacking anothers thread
trying to get revenge for your past humiliations
learn to let go "Mate."
You rushed into my thread with name calling and accusations about my old client work being "game mods"
instead of poser animations rendered in Maxon C4D ( about which you clearly know nothing )
you were defending an obsessed person who later turned his attacks on you.
I cooked you both with deadly precision and some entertaining
animations, based on your own posts, with Reallusion Cartoon Animator (Not AI)
you fled the thread claiming it was an "ambush" with the promise of: " Never interacting with me again "
yet here you are hijacking anothers thread
trying to get revenge for your past humiliations
learn to let go "Mate."
REPLY
! REPORT
@anabran
Oddly I agree with some of what you say, however keeping me blocked shows your still unwilling to have a two way discussion.
You did not cook anything and your animations I will not mention as I do not wish to be insulting, only constructive. I left your thread not fled, It was pointless trying to discuss anything . Let it go? Indeed lets move on, unblock me then. Mate!
Oddly I agree with some of what you say, however keeping me blocked shows your still unwilling to have a two way discussion.
You did not cook anything and your animations I will not mention as I do not wish to be insulting, only constructive. I left your thread not fled, It was pointless trying to discuss anything . Let it go? Indeed lets move on, unblock me then. Mate!
REPLY
! REPORT
Bu-Es - you rascal - you really showed me up (see my comment above 
Honestly - I thought I had seen some magical software in your " Software used " section with which you can get the last contrast out of a picture (with lots of buttons and sliders - i.e. manual work). Maybe I should stop smoking that weird weed from our garden after all ....
I took a closer look at the picture posted by JohnnyLuck777. Well - unless for whatever reason you forgot to mirror a copied section of the chest when working with Photoshop, the AI has played some dirty tricks on you: the abdominal muscles on the right side look upside down, there are diagonal muscles across the entire chest that don't exist ... and the left thumb - thanks to AI - indicates the onset of gout. That's AI ... or better said NI ( No Intelligence
Nevertheless: I like your models ... and Luis is perfect for my next project. It's just landed on my download list. Promo coming soon (without AI or post-processing
Have a nice day

Honestly - I thought I had seen some magical software in your " Software used " section with which you can get the last contrast out of a picture (with lots of buttons and sliders - i.e. manual work). Maybe I should stop smoking that weird weed from our garden after all ....

I took a closer look at the picture posted by JohnnyLuck777. Well - unless for whatever reason you forgot to mirror a copied section of the chest when working with Photoshop, the AI has played some dirty tricks on you: the abdominal muscles on the right side look upside down, there are diagonal muscles across the entire chest that don't exist ... and the left thumb - thanks to AI - indicates the onset of gout. That's AI ... or better said NI ( No Intelligence

Nevertheless: I like your models ... and Luis is perfect for my next project. It's just landed on my download list. Promo coming soon (without AI or post-processing

Have a nice day

REPLY
! REPORT
Your latest "work" is generative AI, and a lot more than 10%.
You aren't changing lights around in your scene. You aren't rendering with a new environment. You aren't creating a new mood. You're uploading a reference image, clicking some buttons, and poof - AI spits out something new for you.
Who are you trying to fool? Us, or yourself?
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
You aren't changing lights around in your scene. You aren't rendering with a new environment. You aren't creating a new mood. You're uploading a reference image, clicking some buttons, and poof - AI spits out something new for you.
Who are you trying to fool? Us, or yourself?
https://huggingface.co/spaces/lllyasviel/IC-Light
https://iclightai.com/ic-light-v2
REPLY
! REPORT
bu_es
Karma: 10,703
Tue, Jun 03I always remain respectful even if they attack me... because if you take the trouble to make many responses to my images and here... it's supposed to be something you said by chance... But I don't see an image of you anywhere, not even in the avatar.
I dont wish to attack in anyway, just pointing out the facts regarding the software being used.
This is from the IC Light2 webpage, they use words like AI driven generator right on the page. This is not specifically about you. It is the AI tools being used.

This is from the IC Light2 webpage, they use words like AI driven generator right on the page. This is not specifically about you. It is the AI tools being used.

REPLY
! REPORT
bu_es
Karma: 10,703
Tue, Jun 03At this point, I wonder if my sin is using AI or being stupidly honest... At this point, I'd also ban all modern design programs because they have AI. We're reaching a very high level of denial, and it's not good for anyone.By the way, I know that IC Lightv2 is based on AI Flux, to be more exact. And the first version was based on Stable Diffusion 1.5. It also allowed you to completely modify your character, whether you wanted it or not.
the joker of spades
Karma: 24,982
Tue, Jun 03You have done nothing wrong and unlike others you have been very honest and for this you deserve my respect.
Tenserknot
Karma: 7,953
Tue, Jun 03"At this point, I wonder if my sin is using AI or being stupidly honest..."
Neither of those.
Everyone has the right to use the new AI tools as much as they want without issue, but on this site it is restricted up to a point, wheras Renderosity has countless AI images uploaded everyday without any issue. Daz3D also has an AI generated and enhanced gallery.
And being honest is alway the best policy. Why hide what you are doing unless... More respect to you for being honest.
In this case, the issue was your math. saying it was "10%" Anyone with some knowledge in 3D rendering knew that numbers you were presenting was incorrect. That is what people were discussing. And you know that.
Neither of those.
Everyone has the right to use the new AI tools as much as they want without issue, but on this site it is restricted up to a point, wheras Renderosity has countless AI images uploaded everyday without any issue. Daz3D also has an AI generated and enhanced gallery.
And being honest is alway the best policy. Why hide what you are doing unless... More respect to you for being honest.
In this case, the issue was your math. saying it was "10%" Anyone with some knowledge in 3D rendering knew that numbers you were presenting was incorrect. That is what people were discussing. And you know that.
Quote:At this point, I wonder if my sin is using AI or being stupidly honest...
You should always be honest in disclosing if you have used AI particularly in a community that prohibits it in their galleries and contests
It's better to find other communities for showcasing your 3D/AI restyled works.
https://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/591121/remixing-your-art-with-ai#latest
You should always be honest in disclosing if you have used AI particularly in a community that prohibits it in their galleries and contests
It's better to find other communities for showcasing your 3D/AI restyled works.
https://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/591121/remixing-your-art-with-ai#latest
REPLY
! REPORT






















